Sign in to your account



This field is required


forgot your password?


New to the site? Create an account →

Blog (7) · comments · rss · json

  7 articles   clear


Jan 8th, 2021 at 7:26:47 pm

tcr! · Jan 8, 2021 at 7:26 pm

A person cannot just say whatever one wants in a public setting. There *are* federal and states laws against certain forms of speech. Here in the good old USA free speech doesn’t mean *any* speech. If you’re on a high horse about this you may be on the wrong horse.

πŸ΄πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ #protip #legalnews

7 comments

keamoose keamoose · Jan 8, 2021 at 8:18 pm

I figure you can say anything for which you’re willing to accept the consequences. πŸš“

tcr! tcr! · Jan 8, 2021 at 9:22 pm

Exactly this ^^^

Do what you what but you might end up in jail, or worse: suspended on Twitter.

keamoose keamoose · Jan 8, 2021 at 9:24 pm

Oh no! Not twitter!

Video (MP4): Unthinkable the horror

Reply

It’d be better if you signed in before commenting


Post

edox edox · Jan 8, 2021 at 11:36 pm

So many have no idea what a Terms of Service is and how it relates to free speech.

tcr! tcr! · Jan 9, 2021 at 7:41 am

Totally. Too many people on the internet act like it’s their god given right to act like an asshole, regardless if violates laws or whatever platform’s policies they’re using.

I often wonder if people would talk the way they do online if they were in the grocery store. Because if they did 1- they’d get kicked out of the store, 2- banned from said store, and 3- possibly face legal action.

But now that I’m typing this out loud, I’m sure the current president is the same in real life as he is on Twitter. So yeah, he most likely would be kicked out of the grocery store. And then some moron would yell “BUT FREE SPEECH!!”

Reply

It’d be better if you signed in before commenting


Post

fiatlux423 · Jan 9, 2021 at 10:52 am

You can’t call in a bomb threat to a school, you can’t tell fire into a crowded theater. You can’t verbally assault someone. Say whatever you want, but there can and should be consequences sometimes.

tcr! tcr! · Jan 9, 2021 at 2:06 pm

BUT CENSORSHIP 🀐

Reply

It’d be better if you signed in before commenting


Post

Add a comment

It’d be better if you signed in before commenting


Post

Kevin Ketchum controls What’s Happening

tcr! · Sep 21, 2018 at 10:08 am

In lawsuit, Elburn company claims Facebook page secretly favors advertisers

In its lawsuit, Patriot Heating and Cooling argues Kevin Ketchum gives preferential treatment to advertisers on the “What’s Happening” pages — for which Ketchum serves as administrator. The site has more than 100,000 members in Aurora, Batavia, Campton Hills, Elgin, Geneva, Naperville, Elgin and St. Charles.

The suit argues that Ketchum has intentionally deleted posts from community members that are favorable to the competitors of Ketchum’s advertisers, let a disparaging post about Patriot stay up on the Facebook page, thereby hurting the company’s reputation and future business, and has engaged in a deceptive practice by taking ads without disclosing this information.

This is from 2017 but still good. I’ve had my own run-ins with Ketchum and his “What’s Happening” Facebook groups.

Actively deleting recommendations if they’re not on his advertiser list is pretty shady when most group members think it’s community page.

#legalnews

2 comments

sinceresarcasm · Sep 21, 2018 at 3:23 pm

He clearly hasn’t grasped the rule of using the verbiage “sponsored content” or “paid content”

tcr! tcr! · Sep 21, 2018 at 3:40 pm

Nope. He’s definitely grasped the concept of the delete button though… πŸ˜‰

Reply

It’d be better if you signed in before commenting


Post

Add a comment

It’d be better if you signed in before commenting


Post

Jun 5th, 2018 at 12:32:11 pm

tcr! · Jun 5, 2018 at 12:32 pm

So I found this website on the internet:
getmyfbifile.com/form.php

Have you guys got your file?

#legalnews #desperatelyseekingsusan

Add a comment

It’d be better if you signed in before commenting


Post

“Pensions are bullet proof”

tcr! · Jul 21, 2017 at 11:57 am

oj simpson could take home 25 000 a month when hes released from prison

O.J. Simpson Could Take Home $25,000 a Month When He’s Released From Prison

O.J. Simpson was granted parole Thursday — meaning he will be a free man as early as Oct. 1.

But what will Simpson’s life be like when he gets out of jail? Simpson still owes tens of millions of dollars in the wake of a 1997 civil lawsuit, in which he was found liable for the wrongful deaths of his ex-wife Nicole Brown and Ronald Goldman, and ordered to pay $33.5 million in damages to the survivors’ families.

Even so, Simpson will probably be quite comfortable financially when he is released from jail, thanks to pensions that may pay out more than $25,000 per month — funds that aren’t subject to seizure by creditors.

#legalnews #ojsimpson

Add a comment

It’d be better if you signed in before commenting


Post

First Muslim woman judge found dead in the Hudson

tcr! · Apr 13, 2017 at 8:53 am

First Muslim woman judge found dead in the Hudson

Judge found dead in Hudson River was ‘force for good’

A pioneering judge, who became the first Muslim woman in US history to serve on the bench, was found dead Wednesday — washed up on the Manhattan side of the Hudson River, sources said.

Her husband later identified her body. Sources said it showed no obvious signs of trauma or injuries indicating criminality or foul play, and that her death appeared to be a suicide.

“She was a pioneer,” he said. “Through her writings, her wisdom, and her unshakable moral compass, she was a force for good whose legacy will be felt for years to come. I was proud to appoint her to the state’s highest court and am deeply saddened by her passing.”

After reading the article a couple of times it just doesn’t sound like she would be the type to commit suicide. You never know about people of course but considering where a good vocal percent of country seems to be regarding Muslims I doubt if she just jumped in the river to do herself in. Do people really do themselves in by drowning?

#legalnews #muslims #rip

1 comment

jimi hindrance experience jimi hindrance experience · Apr 14, 2017 at 1:53 am

***Originally there were a lot of words here that made light of the fear of drowning. I probably shouldn’t do that. I have been able to swim and completely unafraid of drowning since I can remember. You’d have to be hellbent to drown yourself. If you learn to swim you’ll wonder why you waited so long. People can float. That is not my arrogant opinion.

Now flying, on the other hand, is harder. I’ve had the power of flight for quite some time and it comes in damn handy. It’s kinda hard to teach though. I always end up with these Nervous Nelly types for students and when it comes time to soar or sink, they practically always disappoint me.
“Why do we have to start way up here on the 7th floor? Can’t I just go up on the roof of the garage?”
You’ve never heard such whining.

Reply

It’d be better if you signed in before commenting


Post

Add a comment

It’d be better if you signed in before commenting


Post

That’s how they do in Arizona

tcr! · Jun 15, 2015 at 10:26 am

New Law Determines Bullets No Longer Responsibility Of Owner Once Fired From Gun

New Law Determines Bullets No Longer Responsibility Of Owner Once Fired From Gun

PHOENIX—In an attempt to clarify the rights and obligations of those possessing firearms, the Arizona State Legislature approved a new law Wednesday declaring that a gun owner ceases to be responsible for a bullet once it has been fired from a weapon. “It simply makes no sense to hold people accountable for a round of ammunition that is no longer inside their gun, and this legislation clears this up once and for all,” said bill co-sponsor Sen. Steve Smith (R-Maricopa), observing that no one can reasonably expect an individual to exert control over a bullet or a bullet’s ultimate whereabouts once it has exited a gun’s barrel.

#legal #guns #funnies

7 comments

keamoose keamoose · Jun 15, 2015 at 1:50 pm

Somewhere, somebody is using that article as reference material to draft a real bill.

Reply

It’d be better if you signed in before commenting


Post

tcr! tcr! · Jun 15, 2015 at 3:36 pm

It wouldn’t surprise me if the Onion found it out in the trash behind the Arizona State Capitol building in Phoenix.

PS- They got me. I thought it was real when I first saw the headline on another site.

Reply

It’d be better if you signed in before commenting


Post

keamoose keamoose · Jun 15, 2015 at 3:42 pm

It seemed really, really plausible, especially given some of the ones that ARE real.

Reply

It’d be better if you signed in before commenting


Post

Reply

It’d be better if you signed in before commenting


Post

tcr! tcr! · Jun 16, 2015 at 9:08 am

This is another good one…

http://newsthump.com/2012/05/10/north-carolina-votes-to-maintain-sanctity-of-cousins-marrying/

Especially…

“Of course, I chose to ignore the bit in Timothy 2:12 which says ‘no woman should have permission to teach’, as I would have had to stay home otherwise.”

Reply

It’d be better if you signed in before commenting


Post

jimi hindrance experience jimi hindrance experience · Jun 18, 2015 at 9:27 am

this shit never (always) surprises me. the onion is never far from the truth.

Reply

It’d be better if you signed in before commenting


Post

tcr! tcr! · Jun 19, 2015 at 6:57 am

Totally never far…and that’s what makes the bait so convincing. And you just know that most Arizonies would pass some shit like this given the chance.

Reply

It’d be better if you signed in before commenting


Post

Add a comment

It’d be better if you signed in before commenting


Post

Jun 12th, 2015 at 2:53:21 pm

tcr! · Jun 12, 2015 at 9:53 pm

For art’s sake! Photoing neighbors with zoom lens not a privacy invasion

For art’s sake! Photoing neighbors with zoom lens not a privacy invasion

An artist who hid in his apartment’s shadows and deployed a telephoto lens to photograph his neighbors through their glass-walled apartment is not liable for invading their privacy, a New York state appellate court has ruled.

The appeals court called it a “technological home invasion” but said the defendant used the pictures for art’s sake. Because of that, the First Department of the New York Appellate Division ruled Thursday in favor of artist Arne Svenson, who snapped the pics from his lower Manhattan residence as part of an art exhibit called “The Neighbors.”

#arts #legalnews

Add a comment

It’d be better if you signed in before commenting


Post